Leila

When I build software, I don’t just write code and hope it works. Testing plays a key role from start to finish. It helps me discover issues, improve quality, and deliver reliable results. But let me be clear—testing isn’t just about executing software to catch bugs. That’s only one part. In reality, I follow a complete cycle of test activities, from planning through to archiving. These steps ensure I stay organized, hit goals, and communicate clearly with everyone involved. And I repeat these activities in every iteration, no matter the project size or industry.

When I develop software, testing becomes my compass. It guides me toward stability, reliability, and user satisfaction. However, despite its importance, testing isn’t a silver bullet. It doesn’t magically eliminate all bugs or guarantee perfection. In this article, I’ll explore the limitations of software tests, explain why exhaustive testing can’t be done, and reveal how context shapes every testing strategy.

When I first stepped into the world of software development, I imagined defects as mysterious glitches. But over time, I realized that the origins of software defects are far from magical. They don’t appear out of thin air. They come from very real human actions. In this article, I’ll explore why defects happen, how they creep into code, and what we can do to stop them. Let’s uncover the truth and improve the quality of our software—step by step.

Choosing the right testing strategy makes or breaks a software project. I’ve been there. Sometimes, everything flows logically from one step to the next. Other times, I need flexibility to adapt quickly. That’s exactly where the waterfall vs. agile testing debate kicks in. In this article, I’ll walk you through both methods. You’ll learn how each one works. You’ll also see when to use them to get the best results. Let’s dive in!